Ascension Sunday Reflection – Cycle A

The mystery of the Ascension can sometimes be approached too quickly, as though it were merely a departure scene, a final movement before the Church turns to other things. Yet in the Cistercian tradition especially, it is received with a quieter tenderness: not as absence, but as transformation; not as abandonment, but as a deepening of presence.

For monks, the language of departure carries a particular weight. Stability teaches one to remain—to stay in a place, to endure the ordinary contours of a life. And yet the spiritual life is full of paradox. One may remain outwardly still while being drawn ever upward in desire. One may seem alone and yet become more profoundly accompanied.

The Ascension speaks into precisely this paradox.

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux writes with characteristic intensity about the soul’s longing for God, describing the Christian life not as possession, but as desire continually enlarged: “The reason for loving God is God himself; the measure of loving God is to love without measure.” That movement of love without measure is, in some sense, the interior shape of the Ascension. Christ’s glorification is not simply an ending to be observed from below, but an opening of the human heart toward where he has gone.

What is striking is that the Ascension dignifies our humanity rather than diminishing it. Human flesh is not discarded; human life is not outgrown. What is taken into divine glory is precisely what was assumed in humility. The Cistercian instinct has always been to hold this truth with gentleness: creation matters, bodies matter, labour matters, time matters, silence matters. The ordinary textures of life are not obstacles to God, but the very place where grace begins its patient work.

Saint Aelred of Rievaulx, so perceptive in matters of the heart, understood that spiritual growth is relational before it is conceptual. Love draws us upward because love always seeks communion. The Ascension, then, is not Christ moving farther away, but drawing humanity more deeply into divine friendship. If friendship is, as Aelred says, a step toward the love and knowledge of God, then the risen Christ’s exaltation becomes not distance but invitation.

This matters, because many spiritual lives are marked by the experience of God seeming absent.

There are seasons when prayer feels thin, when certainty evaporates, when faith becomes less radiant and more deliberate. The Ascension does not deny such experiences; it quietly names them. The visible Christ is no longer grasped in the old way. Presence changes form.

Yet the Cistercian tradition has never feared this hiddenness.

William of Saint-Thierry speaks of God’s work in the soul as something often concealed, deeper than immediate feeling. God is not absent because he is hidden. Often, hiddenness is precisely how divine intimacy matures us. The soul learns not simply to cling to consolations, but to be quietly remade.

Perhaps this is one of the quiet gifts of the Ascension: it teaches mature love.

A child wishes never to lose sight of the beloved. Mature love discovers that communion can deepen even in altered forms. Christ’s withdrawal from ordinary visibility is not indifference; it is trust. Humanity is no longer merely to follow externally, but to become inwardly conformed.

Thomas Merton understood this movement well. He wrote that “the gate of heaven is everywhere.” That feels like an Ascension insight. Heaven is not simply elsewhere in a geographical sense; it has broken into human existence through Christ, altering the meaning of earthly life itself. If Christ is raised, then the world is no longer spiritually flat. Even the workshop, the kitchen, the cloister walk, the hospital room, the commuter train—each becomes a place where eternity brushes against time.

Michael Casey often returns to the theme of patient transformation. Holiness, he reminds us, is usually slow, ordinary, and unspectacular. That too resonates here. The Ascension is not permission to stand gazing upward, detached from the life entrusted to us. It is an invitation to faithful presence within it, trusting that what is human can indeed be transfigured.

There is also a quiet consolation here for those conscious of incompleteness.

Much of life remains unresolved. Character forms slowly. Prayer falters. Relationships bear strain. Communities disappoint. Even our best intentions remain partial. Yet the Ascension proclaims—without insistence, but with quiet certainty—that human destiny is not defined by present fragmentation. Christ carries our humanity into the life of God not because it has perfected itself, but because it has been claimed by mercy.

For Cistercians, whose spirituality is marked by humility, this is no small consolation. One does not ascend by self-engineering, but by grace.

Guerric of Igny, with his luminous theological imagination, speaks of Christ drawing believers upward even as they remain pilgrims below. The movement toward God is real, but it is always initiated by the One who first descended in love.

So perhaps a gentle way to live with the Ascension is this:

Not to think first of departure, but of promise.
Not to interpret hiddenness as abandonment.
Not to despise the ordinary.
Not to imagine holiness as escape from humanity.

But rather to trust that in Christ, our humanity has already entered the heart of God—and that every small act of fidelity, every honest prayer, every labour undertaken in hope is already being drawn into that same transforming ascent.